Sugar, Sugar, Everywhere–the many names and kinds of sugars in our food

Years ago, a woman at my daughter’s daycare commented favorably regarding some sort of fruit-leather-ish snack, “And it doesn’t have any sugar.” At the time I thought, “I seriously doubt that,” suspecting she just hadn’t recognized some form of sugar in it. Unfortunately, it wasn’t a good moment to delve into the actual ingredients and discover just what sort of sugar was actually involved, so I let it pass.

To be fair, sugars come in so many varieties and are known by so many names (sometimes the same sugar has more than one name) that it’s hard to keep up with them all. So I’ve been doing a little research (mostly online) so I can present a list of different kinds of sugars and a little information on each, as well as some information on common sweeteners such as honey and corn syrup.
First, there are the simple sugars. I’m not a chemist and this isn’t meant to be a chemistry lesson, so I’m just going to say that the simple sugars we’re interested in have six carbon atoms and some hydrogen and oxygen atoms in various configurations, and other sugars are built from them. The simple sugars we typically hear about or see listed are the following:
Glucose: Diabetics have to keep track of the levels of glucose in their blood. Glucose that is added to foods sometimes goes by the name of “dextrose”. Glucose is somewhat less sweet than sucrose, apparently.*
Dextrose: See glucose.
Fructose: Known as fruit sugar, it is commonly found in fruits, but is also used as a sweetener sometimes. Sweeter than sucrose.
Galactose: I’m listing this one mostly because it is a component of lactose. Less sweet than sucrose.
Second, there are the disaccharides, which are sugars made up of two simple sugar molecules bonded together. Here are some of interest:
Sucrose(white sugar, table sugar): Made of a glucose molecule bonded to a fructose molecule.
Lactose(milk sugar): One glucose molecule bonded to one galactose molecule. Some people no longer have enough of the enzyme to break it down, in which case the lactose gets used by bacteria much farther down the intestinal tract with uncomfortable results. Lactose is apparently only mildly sweet, which maybe explains why lactose-free milk (in which the lactose has been broken down into glucose and galactose) tastes sweeter than regular milk.
Maltose: one glucose bonded to one glucose. Maltose is apparently significantly less sweet than sucrose, but sweeter than lactose. I should add that the properties of substances made of two or more sugars depends a lot on how the sugar molecules are bonded together—longer chains of glucose, depending on length and kind of bond, can be starches or cellulose. More on those later.
Alpha-gal: One galactose molecule bonded to another galactose molecule. Some people have a tick-bite induced allergy to alpha-gal, and react to beef and other meat from mammals. As far as I know, alpha-gal doesn’t get used as a sweetener and I have no idea if it tastes sweet.
Finally, there are longer chains of sugar molecules. In particular, there are starches and cellulose.
Starches are long chains of glucose molecules. Our bodies can break these down into glucose when we eat them.
Cellulose, on the other hand, we cannot break down. Cellulose molecules are very VERY long chains of glucose. They are found in plants and help give them structure. They also provide us with “fiber” as they go right through our system. Cows, rabbits, termites and other animals that have a diet heavy in grass (or wood)  have systems that can break down cellulose. I think most of these systems involve special bacteria.
So what sugars are actually in the various alternative sweeteners out there? I had to look this up, as I have never really been sure what is in honey or maple syrup, let alone agave syrup.
Honey: Apparently it contains both glucose and fructose, but separate from each other, not bonded together to form sucrose. At least, that was my understanding from what I read.
Maple syrup: Sucrose. Okay, that’s simple.
Corn syrup (not high fructose corn syrup, but Karo corn syrup that you cook with): Glucose. It sounds like this is roughly the same as the “glucose syrup” that shows up in British recipes.
High-fructose corn syrup: This is the one that gets added to a lot of processed foods. It contains both glucose and fructose. Hmmm, does that make HFCS a lot like honey, except for the flavor? Or does honey contain other interesting things that change how it affects us? I do not know. They sound pretty similar, sugar-wise. Another interesting thing: The HFCS industry is trying to persuade people that since high-fructose corn syrup contains the same molecules as sucrose, they should be no more concerned about it than they are about sucrose. But since how molecules are bonded together sometimes makes a difference in how they affect us, I’m suspicious of this reasoning.
Agave syrup: Apparently this is very high in fructose.
Also, concentrated pear juice and concentrated grape juice are sometimes added to foods for the purpose of sweetening them. These may have high levels of fructose.
I didn’t list stevia because it is something else entirely and not made of sugars.
To repeat, I’m not a chemist (I took organic chemistry in college, but that was more years ago that I care to admit). So if I have said something misleading by mistake, please comment with a correction.
Till next post.
 *I wasn’t able to find out if the comparisons of sweetness were weight-for-weight, or by volume (unlikely) or for comparable concentrations of molecules. I don’t think this information is very useful without knowing this. I’m guessing it was weight-for-weight.

Peach Kentucky Pudding—very easy, very tasty

Some of the best desserts are the easiest ones. Earlier I posted recipes for vanilla and chocolate custards that could be made in the microwave. Today I’m going to give you “Kentucky Pudding”, a cross between a fruit cobbler and Indian pudding.

I had never heard of Kentucky Pudding until I ran across it years ago in the Woman’s Day Encyclopedia of Cooking. I’ve never come across it since, which makes me wonder whether they made the name up for the cookbook. I can’t remember why I tried it in the first place, since I don’t usually get very excited about fruit desserts, but I do remember that I made it with peaches from a tree at work. They were soft, slightly wrinkled, very juicy peaches, and they needed to be used right away. They made an excellent Kentucky Pudding. And that is the key—use good fruit. This is the dessert to make when you find you’ve bought slightly too many strawberries or peaches at the farmer’s market or produce stand, but not so many that it’s worth making jam.
I ended up modifying the recipe, as it seemed to use way more butter than was necessary (about 6 tablespoons, as I recall.)
This dessert tastes wonderful, but it doesn’t look very impressive, so no photos. I recommend serving it warm in a bowl with some milk poured over it—or better yet, half-and-half. It reheats well.
Yum.
Kentucky Pudding
Fruit mix
2 cups diced or sliced fresh fruit (peaches, strawberries)
½ or more teaspoons sugar, depending on sweetness of fruit
Dry mix
¼ cup cornmeal
¼ cup all-purpose flour
1/3 cup sugar 
3/4 teaspoon baking powder
1/8 teaspoon salt
Liquid mix
1 egg
3 tablespoons milk
¼ teaspoon vanilla
For the casserole
2 tablespoons butter
½ teaspoon cinnamon
Preheat oven to 400. Melt butter in a round 1-quart casserole, coating the sides, and sprinkle cinnamon over it. (You may not have a round 1-quart casserole. An 8×8 glass casserole dish works, or even a large, oven-safe pottery bowl. If you use the 8×8 or other shallow pan, check the time early. It may not take much more than 20 minutes.)
Mix cut-up fruit and sugar and set aside. Note: you can leave the skin on the peaches. It won’t hurt.
Mix dry ingredients and liquid ingredients separately, then mix together. Add fruit and mix it in. Scoop it into your prepared casserole. Put it in the oven.
Bake for 20 minutes at 400, then reduce heat to 350 and bake an additional 15-20 minutes or until firm. It may not need the full time.
Cool slightly, then scoop into bowls and serve with whole milk or half-and-half. Makes about 4 servings.

This recipe works well with either peaches or strawberries. I haven’t tried this with plums, but it should be good with other berries. However, if you use blueberries, I suggest leaving off the cinnamon and adding a bit of lemon zest to the batter instead.

Till next post.

Candy Hearts and Conversation Sweets


Valentine’s Day is nearly here. Shelves in stores are crowded with red and pink containers. Much of the space is taken up by chocolate in heart-shaped boxes, but there are also a lot of bags of what is basically heart-shaped sugar. The most Valentine’s-y of these are the candy hearts.
Candy hearts are so appealing that you can find them depicted on fabrics, wrapping paper, and cards. I guess Hershey’s kisses show up once in a while, but candy hearts are a much more popular Valentine’s Day icon.
What’s so appealing about them? I think it’s the messages. Without messages, candy hearts would be just another heart-shaped candy that isn’t chocolate. Boring.
But what is it about the messages that makes candy hearts fun? After all, they aren’t exactly poetry. Mostly candy hearts offer a random assortment of sentimental cliches and catch-phrases, nothing particularly interesting or original.
I think what makes them fun is the very fact that you get such an assortment. You can pick through the hearts till you find just the right message to hand to a particular person. It might be a compliment: “Shining Star”, “You Are Nice”, or “Dear One”. It might be a request: “Be My Friend”, “Let’s Talk”, “Dance With Me.” It might even be a question: “Will You Marry Me?”
Alternatively, you can draw one at random and be surprised. It’s a bit like a fortune cookie.
It occurs to me that, like many other things, candy hearts lend themselves to stories. What if someone pulled a candy heart out of a jar, just for a quick mouthful of sugar, and discovered that it said something really unexpected?
 “You are being watched.”
 Or: “She’s lying.”
Or: “Look up.”
In fact, candy hearts (or something like them) do show up in stories. In Mary Poppins Comes Back by P. L. Travers, Mary takes the children to a very odd store where she asks for “an ounce of Conversations.”
“‘Are those the Conversations?’ asked Jane, pointing to the Jar. ‘They look more like sweets.’

‘So they are, Miss! They’re Conversation Sweets,’ said Uncle Dodger, dusting the jar with his apron.”
Jane gets “a flat star-shaped sweet rather like a peppermint” with the words “You’re My Fancy.” Michael pulls out a shell-shaped one with “I Love You. Do You Love Me?” The twins, John and Barbara, are given “Deedle deedle dumpling” and “Shining-bright and airy”, but Mary Poppins’s sweet is shaped like a half-moon and reads, “Ten o’clock to-night.”
Naturally, Mary Poppins explains nothing, and equally naturally, strange things happen that night at ten o’clock.
The tales of Raggedy Ann also involve a candy heart, if I remember correctly. A disaster leads to Raggedy Ann being restuffed, and the woman repairing her puts in a candy heart that says “I love you.” Later, Raggedy Ann falls in some water, and she tells her friends that since the candy has melted, the “I love you” is now spread throughout her insides.*
But enough about stories. Setting aside the content of the messages for the moment, how well do candy hearts succeed at being Valentine decorations? The colors are fine and so is the shape, but I have mixed feelings about the way they are printed. I like the large ones from Brach’s because they have longer messages, but the words look like they came from a bad dot-matrix printer. On the positive side, I suspect whatever technique they are now using allows them to vary the messages more, which is all to the good. Maybe the quality of the print will improve over the coming years. The Sweetheart brand small hearts have a long way to go—they are often barely readable.
And how well do candy hearts succeed at being candy—that is, how do they taste? I bought the small Sweethearts because Sweethearts are made by the New England Confectionery Company, which makes NECCO wafers. I like NECCO wafers, and the hearts looked as though they were made of the same stuff, so I expected them to taste the same.
When I tasted the various colors, though, I wondered if they’d changed the flavors of their hearts. I don’t remember green being green-apple flavored, and the blue… did they even have blue hearts earlier? A quick check on-line shows that the flavors changed some years ago, which makes me wonder when I last bought Sweethearts. (They contain gelatin, so maybe not since my daughter went vegetarian?)
Since I don’t like the flavors very much, and certainly don’t need the extra sugar, I wonder if it wouldn’t be better to skip the candy altogether and substitute colorful paper hearts or wooden hearts with messages on the reverse. (I’m sure these must exist.) But then what does your friend or sweetie do when you hand them a suitably-messaged heart? Keep it forever? Smile appreciation and then toss it in the trash? (Or back in the bowl, if it’s a wooden heart?) There’s something to be said for being able to pop the message in one’s mouth after reading it.
Happy Valentine’s Day!
Till next post.
* Build-a-Bear uses a non-edible version of this trick.